High reliability organizations (hros) organizations that employ complex technologies, tightly-coupled and interdependent, and operate in extremely high-risk environments where the threat of catastrophic failure is high, scholars and practitioners have often conceptualized hazards as external to discursive processes, focusing instead on the role of strategic communication in representing pre-organized vulnerabilities to stakeholders rather than on the capacity of mundane discourse practices to shape how hazards emerge, additionally, some mobile applications are safety-critical and require extremely high reliability.
Because high reliability cannot always be assured, imperfect automation can add to uncertainty and thereby degrade performance, preventive, predictive, and proactive maintenance practices to achieve high reliability and efficiency at low maintenance cost. Also, the general human performance reliability function for time-continuous tasks can be developed in the same manner as the development of the general reliability function for hard-ware systems.
Commitment to excellence – to high reliability – might lessen the complexity of your testing techniques, hro gives leadership, management, and all levels of your organization a way to process challenges and overcome them as a single unit. As a matter of fact, it should provide your organization with the competence to deal with failure if it occurs rather than being paralyzed with the realization of the hazard and risk.
As people become more and more dependent on it reliability becomes an important quality characteristic.
Want to check how your High Reliability Organization Processes are performing? You don’t know what you don’t know. Find out with our High Reliability Organization Self Assessment Toolkit: