Rate limiting is the most common capacity management approach for API gateways, and concurrency management is a fundamentally better concept for a variety of reasons, data management is an extremely rich and complex topic in its own right and encompasses a number of professions and technical competencies, also, additionally, unplanned technical debt is a constant unseen threat – and it can build up at any time, even with the best of intentions.
In lower-return situations, although some management techniques can have very positive impacts e.g.
However, excessive technical debt will cause availability and scalability issues, and can choke business innovation (too much engineering time dealing with debt rather than focusing on the product), with new technologies comes new processes, tools, architecture and all sorts of change management, leaders and technical person alike need to be prepared and have a vision, get a jump start with someone who has already been through the challenges, especially, technical debt management consists of technical and organizational aspects, which make it a challenge in software development.
Find quality talent to work full-time, part-time, or hourly who will seamlessly integrate into your team, once you realise how the technology solves an existing problem, it can unlock ideas about new uses for it, furthermore, behavioral economics and quantitative analysis use many of the same tools of technical analysis, which, being an aspect of active management, stands in contradiction to much of modern portfolio theory.
Dramatically affecting your ability to develop new features over time, technical debt is very often a concern when it comes to legacy software, by the same token, development work is still disconnected from the business needs and teams are struggling to accommodate decades old software architectures, resulting in substantial technical debt.
By avoiding technical debt and delivering only tested and working products, agile can avoid having systems integration issues getting out of hand, which could lead to project failure, agile, other management systems focused on risk management are more critical to success and the high tech approach fails, by the same token, the absence of technical debt probably means missed business opportunities – use technical debt as a tool to best meet the needs of the business Excessive technical debt will cause availability and scalability issues, and can choke business innovation (too much engineering time dealing with debt rather than focusing on the product).
Want to check how your Managing Technical Debt Processes are performing? You don’t know what you don’t know. Find out with our Managing Technical Debt Self Assessment Toolkit: