Save time, empower your teams and effectively upgrade your processes with access to this practical Scientific computing Toolkit and guide. Address common challenges with best-practice templates, step-by-step work plans and maturity diagnostics for any Scientific computing related project.

Download the Toolkit and in Three Steps you will be guided from idea to implementation results.

 

store.theartofservice.com/Scientific-computing-toolkit-best-practice-templates-step-by-step-work-plans-and-maturity-diagnostics/

 

The Toolkit contains the following practical and powerful enablers with new and updated Scientific computing specific requirements:

STEP 1: Get your bearings

Start with…

  • The latest quick edition of the Scientific computing Self Assessment book in PDF containing 49 requirements to perform a quickscan, get an overview and share with stakeholders.

Organized in a data driven improvement cycle RDMAICS (Recognize, Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control and Sustain), check the…

  • Example pre-filled Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard to get familiar with results generation

Then find your goals…

STEP 2: Set concrete goals, tasks, dates and numbers you can track

Featuring new and updated case-based questions, organized into seven core areas of process design, this Self-Assessment will help you identify areas in which Scientific computing improvements can be made.

Examples; 10 of the standard requirements:

  1. Are accountability and ownership for Scientific computing clearly defined?

  2. What tools were used to narrow the list of possible causes?

  3. What do we stand for–and what are we against?

  4. Is a contingency plan established?

  5. Marketing budgets are tighter, consumers are more skeptical, and social media has changed forever the way we talk about Scientific computing. How do we gain traction?

  6. How do we maintain Scientific computing’s Integrity?

  7. Have you identified your Scientific computing key performance indicators?

  8. What are the long-term Scientific computing goals?

  9. Is there any reason to believe the opposite of my current belief?

  10. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?

Complete the self assessment, on your own or with a team in a workshop setting. Use the workbook together with the self assessment requirements spreadsheet:

  • The workbook is the latest in-depth complete edition of the Scientific computing book in PDF containing requirements, which criteria correspond to the criteria in…

Your Scientific computing self-assessment dashboard which gives you your dynamically prioritized projects-ready tool and shows your organization exactly what to do next:

  • The Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard; with the Scientific computing Self-Assessment and Scorecard you will develop a clear picture of which Scientific computing areas need attention, which requirements you should focus on and who will be responsible for them:

    • Shows your organization instant insight in areas for improvement: Auto generates reports, radar chart for maturity assessment, insights per process and participant and bespoke, ready to use, RACI Matrix
    • Gives you a professional Dashboard to guide and perform a thorough Scientific computing Self-Assessment
    • Is secure: Ensures offline data protection of your Self-Assessment results
    • Dynamically prioritized projects-ready RACI Matrix shows your organization exactly what to do next:

 

STEP 3: Implement, Track, follow up and revise strategy

The outcomes of STEP 2, the self assessment, are the inputs for STEP 3; Start and manage Scientific computing projects with the 62 implementation resources:

  • 62 step-by-step Scientific computing Project Management Form Templates covering over 6000 Scientific computing project requirements and success criteria:

Examples; 10 of the check box criteria:

  1. Team Member Performance Assessment: How do you know that all team members are learning?
  2. Probability and Impact Assessment: Do requirements demand the use of new analysis, design, or testing methods?
  3. Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: What kinds of things in particular are you looking for data on?
  4. Activity Cost Estimates: How and when do you enter into Scientific computing project Procurement Management?
  5. Requirements Management Plan: The WBS is developed as part of a Joint Planning session. But how do you know that youve done this right?
  6. Procurement Audit: Is there no evidence that the expert has influenced the decisions taken by the public authority in his/her interest or in the interest of a specific contractor?
  7. Risk Audit: Does the adoption of a business risk audit approach change internal control documentation and testing practices?
  8. Project Management Plan: If the Scientific computing project is complex or scope is specialized, do you have appropriate and/or qualified staff available to perform the tasks?
  9. Project Scope Statement: Will all tasks resulting from issues be entered into the Scientific computing project Plan and tracked through the plan?
  10. Project Management Plan: How can you best help the organization to develop consistent practices in Scientific computing project management planning stages?

 
Step-by-step and complete Scientific computing Project Management Forms and Templates including check box criteria and templates.

1.0 Initiating Process Group:

  • 1.1 Scientific computing project Charter
  • 1.2 Stakeholder Register
  • 1.3 Stakeholder Analysis Matrix

2.0 Planning Process Group:

  • 2.1 Scientific computing project Management Plan
  • 2.2 Scope Management Plan
  • 2.3 Requirements Management Plan
  • 2.4 Requirements Documentation
  • 2.5 Requirements Traceability Matrix
  • 2.6 Scientific computing project Scope Statement
  • 2.7 Assumption and Constraint Log
  • 2.8 Work Breakdown Structure
  • 2.9 WBS Dictionary
  • 2.10 Schedule Management Plan
  • 2.11 Activity List
  • 2.12 Activity Attributes
  • 2.13 Milestone List
  • 2.14 Network Diagram
  • 2.15 Activity Resource Requirements
  • 2.16 Resource Breakdown Structure
  • 2.17 Activity Duration Estimates
  • 2.18 Duration Estimating Worksheet
  • 2.19 Scientific computing project Schedule
  • 2.20 Cost Management Plan
  • 2.21 Activity Cost Estimates
  • 2.22 Cost Estimating Worksheet
  • 2.23 Cost Baseline
  • 2.24 Quality Management Plan
  • 2.25 Quality Metrics
  • 2.26 Process Improvement Plan
  • 2.27 Responsibility Assignment Matrix
  • 2.28 Roles and Responsibilities
  • 2.29 Human Resource Management Plan
  • 2.30 Communications Management Plan
  • 2.31 Risk Management Plan
  • 2.32 Risk Register
  • 2.33 Probability and Impact Assessment
  • 2.34 Probability and Impact Matrix
  • 2.35 Risk Data Sheet
  • 2.36 Procurement Management Plan
  • 2.37 Source Selection Criteria
  • 2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan
  • 2.39 Change Management Plan

3.0 Executing Process Group:

  • 3.1 Team Member Status Report
  • 3.2 Change Request
  • 3.3 Change Log
  • 3.4 Decision Log
  • 3.5 Quality Audit
  • 3.6 Team Directory
  • 3.7 Team Operating Agreement
  • 3.8 Team Performance Assessment
  • 3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment
  • 3.10 Issue Log

4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group:

  • 4.1 Scientific computing project Performance Report
  • 4.2 Variance Analysis
  • 4.3 Earned Value Status
  • 4.4 Risk Audit
  • 4.5 Contractor Status Report
  • 4.6 Formal Acceptance

5.0 Closing Process Group:

  • 5.1 Procurement Audit
  • 5.2 Contract Close-Out
  • 5.3 Scientific computing project or Phase Close-Out
  • 5.4 Lessons Learned

 

Results

With this Three Step process you will have all the tools you need for any Scientific computing project with this in-depth Scientific computing Toolkit.

In using the Toolkit you will be better able to:

  • Diagnose Scientific computing projects, initiatives, organizations, businesses and processes using accepted diagnostic standards and practices
  • Implement evidence-based best practice strategies aligned with overall goals
  • Integrate recent advances in Scientific computing and put process design strategies into practice according to best practice guidelines

Defining, designing, creating, and implementing a process to solve a business challenge or meet a business objective is the most valuable role; In EVERY company, organization and department.

Unless you are talking a one-time, single-use project within a business, there should be a process. Whether that process is managed and implemented by humans, AI, or a combination of the two, it needs to be designed by someone with a complex enough perspective to ask the right questions. Someone capable of asking the right questions and step back and say, ‘What are we really trying to accomplish here? And is there a different way to look at it?’

This Toolkit empowers people to do just that – whether their title is entrepreneur, manager, consultant, (Vice-)President, CxO etc… – they are the people who rule the future. They are the person who asks the right questions to make Scientific computing investments work better.

This Scientific computing All-Inclusive Toolkit enables You to be that person:

 

store.theartofservice.com/Scientific-computing-toolkit-best-practice-templates-step-by-step-work-plans-and-maturity-diagnostics/

 

Includes lifetime updates

Every self assessment comes with Lifetime Updates and Lifetime Free Updated Books. Lifetime Updates is an industry-first feature which allows you to receive verified self assessment updates, ensuring you always have the most accurate information at your fingertips.