Save time, empower your teams and effectively upgrade your processes with access to this practical Scientific computing Toolkit and guide. Address common challenges with best-practice templates, step-by-step work plans and maturity diagnostics for any Scientific computing related project.

Download the Toolkit and in Three Steps you will be guided from idea to implementation results.

 

store.theartofservice.com/Scientific-computing-toolkit-best-practice-templates-step-by-step-work-plans-and-maturity-diagnostics/

 

The Toolkit contains the following practical and powerful enablers with new and updated Scientific computing specific requirements:

STEP 1: Get your bearings

Start with…

  • The latest quick edition of the Scientific computing Self Assessment book in PDF containing 49 requirements to perform a quickscan, get an overview and share with stakeholders.

Organized in a data driven improvement cycle RDMAICS (Recognize, Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control and Sustain), check the…

  • Example pre-filled Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard to get familiar with results generation

Then find your goals…

STEP 2: Set concrete goals, tasks, dates and numbers you can track

Featuring new and updated case-based questions, organized into seven core areas of process design, this Self-Assessment will help you identify areas in which Scientific computing improvements can be made.

Examples; 10 of the standard requirements:

  1. If our company went out of business tomorrow, would anyone who doesn’t get a paycheck here care?

  2. What have we done to protect our business from competitive encroachment?

  3. Is there a Performance Baseline?

  4. What will be the consequences to the stakeholder (financial, reputation etc) if Scientific computing does not go ahead or fails to deliver the objectives?

  5. Are there any disadvantages to implementing Scientific computing? There might be some that are less obvious?

  6. What information do users need?

  7. Have the concerns of stakeholders to help identify and define potential barriers been obtained and analyzed?

  8. How do we know that any Scientific computing analysis is complete and comprehensive?

  9. How do we maintain Scientific computing’s Integrity?

  10. How can we improve performance?

Complete the self assessment, on your own or with a team in a workshop setting. Use the workbook together with the self assessment requirements spreadsheet:

  • The workbook is the latest in-depth complete edition of the Scientific computing book in PDF containing requirements, which criteria correspond to the criteria in…

Your Scientific computing self-assessment dashboard which gives you your dynamically prioritized projects-ready tool and shows your organization exactly what to do next:

  • The Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard; with the Scientific computing Self-Assessment and Scorecard you will develop a clear picture of which Scientific computing areas need attention, which requirements you should focus on and who will be responsible for them:

    • Shows your organization instant insight in areas for improvement: Auto generates reports, radar chart for maturity assessment, insights per process and participant and bespoke, ready to use, RACI Matrix
    • Gives you a professional Dashboard to guide and perform a thorough Scientific computing Self-Assessment
    • Is secure: Ensures offline data protection of your Self-Assessment results
    • Dynamically prioritized projects-ready RACI Matrix shows your organization exactly what to do next:

 

STEP 3: Implement, Track, follow up and revise strategy

The outcomes of STEP 2, the self assessment, are the inputs for STEP 3; Start and manage Scientific computing projects with the 62 implementation resources:

  • 62 step-by-step Scientific computing Project Management Form Templates covering over 6000 Scientific computing project requirements and success criteria:

Examples; 10 of the check box criteria:

  1. Procurement Audit: Is there no evidence that the consultants participating in the Scientific computing project design released information to contractors competing for the prime contract?
  2. Responsibility Assignment Matrix: Are the overhead pools formally and adequately identified?
  3. Milestone List: What specific improvements did you make to the Scientific computing project proposal since the previous time?
  4. Communications Management Plan: How will the person responsible for executing the communication item be notified?
  5. Risk Audit: To what extent are auditors effective at linking business risks and management assertions?
  6. Project Performance Report: To what degree do individual skills and abilities match task demands?
  7. Project Scope Statement: Is the Scientific computing project Manager qualified and experienced in Scientific computing project Management?
  8. Stakeholder Management Plan: Contradictory information between document sections?
  9. Assumption and Constraint Log: Can the requirements be traced to the appropriate components of the solution, as well as test scripts?
  10. Executing Process Group: Have operating capacities been created and/or reinforced in partners?

 
Step-by-step and complete Scientific computing Project Management Forms and Templates including check box criteria and templates.

1.0 Initiating Process Group:

  • 1.1 Scientific computing project Charter
  • 1.2 Stakeholder Register
  • 1.3 Stakeholder Analysis Matrix

2.0 Planning Process Group:

  • 2.1 Scientific computing project Management Plan
  • 2.2 Scope Management Plan
  • 2.3 Requirements Management Plan
  • 2.4 Requirements Documentation
  • 2.5 Requirements Traceability Matrix
  • 2.6 Scientific computing project Scope Statement
  • 2.7 Assumption and Constraint Log
  • 2.8 Work Breakdown Structure
  • 2.9 WBS Dictionary
  • 2.10 Schedule Management Plan
  • 2.11 Activity List
  • 2.12 Activity Attributes
  • 2.13 Milestone List
  • 2.14 Network Diagram
  • 2.15 Activity Resource Requirements
  • 2.16 Resource Breakdown Structure
  • 2.17 Activity Duration Estimates
  • 2.18 Duration Estimating Worksheet
  • 2.19 Scientific computing project Schedule
  • 2.20 Cost Management Plan
  • 2.21 Activity Cost Estimates
  • 2.22 Cost Estimating Worksheet
  • 2.23 Cost Baseline
  • 2.24 Quality Management Plan
  • 2.25 Quality Metrics
  • 2.26 Process Improvement Plan
  • 2.27 Responsibility Assignment Matrix
  • 2.28 Roles and Responsibilities
  • 2.29 Human Resource Management Plan
  • 2.30 Communications Management Plan
  • 2.31 Risk Management Plan
  • 2.32 Risk Register
  • 2.33 Probability and Impact Assessment
  • 2.34 Probability and Impact Matrix
  • 2.35 Risk Data Sheet
  • 2.36 Procurement Management Plan
  • 2.37 Source Selection Criteria
  • 2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan
  • 2.39 Change Management Plan

3.0 Executing Process Group:

  • 3.1 Team Member Status Report
  • 3.2 Change Request
  • 3.3 Change Log
  • 3.4 Decision Log
  • 3.5 Quality Audit
  • 3.6 Team Directory
  • 3.7 Team Operating Agreement
  • 3.8 Team Performance Assessment
  • 3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment
  • 3.10 Issue Log

4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group:

  • 4.1 Scientific computing project Performance Report
  • 4.2 Variance Analysis
  • 4.3 Earned Value Status
  • 4.4 Risk Audit
  • 4.5 Contractor Status Report
  • 4.6 Formal Acceptance

5.0 Closing Process Group:

  • 5.1 Procurement Audit
  • 5.2 Contract Close-Out
  • 5.3 Scientific computing project or Phase Close-Out
  • 5.4 Lessons Learned

 

Results

With this Three Step process you will have all the tools you need for any Scientific computing project with this in-depth Scientific computing Toolkit.

In using the Toolkit you will be better able to:

  • Diagnose Scientific computing projects, initiatives, organizations, businesses and processes using accepted diagnostic standards and practices
  • Implement evidence-based best practice strategies aligned with overall goals
  • Integrate recent advances in Scientific computing and put process design strategies into practice according to best practice guidelines

Defining, designing, creating, and implementing a process to solve a business challenge or meet a business objective is the most valuable role; In EVERY company, organization and department.

Unless you are talking a one-time, single-use project within a business, there should be a process. Whether that process is managed and implemented by humans, AI, or a combination of the two, it needs to be designed by someone with a complex enough perspective to ask the right questions. Someone capable of asking the right questions and step back and say, ‘What are we really trying to accomplish here? And is there a different way to look at it?’

This Toolkit empowers people to do just that – whether their title is entrepreneur, manager, consultant, (Vice-)President, CxO etc… – they are the people who rule the future. They are the person who asks the right questions to make Scientific computing investments work better.

This Scientific computing All-Inclusive Toolkit enables You to be that person:

 

store.theartofservice.com/Scientific-computing-toolkit-best-practice-templates-step-by-step-work-plans-and-maturity-diagnostics/

 

Includes lifetime updates

Every self assessment comes with Lifetime Updates and Lifetime Free Updated Books. Lifetime Updates is an industry-first feature which allows you to receive verified self assessment updates, ensuring you always have the most accurate information at your fingertips.