Reputational Risk
What is Reputational Risk?
The potential for damage to an organization's public image and stakeholder trust resulting from negative events, actions, or perceptions.
Terms that appear alongside reputational risk
Each of these is named in at least one of the same controls as reputational risk. The number is how many controls name both.
- audit trail 3 shared controls
- audit 3 shared controls
- compliance 3 shared controls
- remediation 2 shared controls
- risk assessment 2 shared controls
- industry self regulation 2 shared controls
- cyber liability 2 shared controls
- ccpa 2 shared controls
Frameworks that govern reputational risk
What the standards actually require on reputational risk
Requirements naming reputational risk across 5 standards, quoted from the control text.
Continuous Monitoring + Lifecycle Management is essential to ongoing trustworthy AI per Japan AI Guidelines for Business + integrates Safety + Accountability + Transparency Principles + addresses post-deployment risks.
JP-AIG-Continuous-Monitoring-Lifecycle-Model-Evaluation-Performance-Drift-Post-Deployment · Japan AI Guidelines Continuous Monitoring + AI System Lifecycle Management + Model Evaluation + Performance Drift + Concept Drift + Post-Deployment + Retraining Triggers + Safe Update + Decommissioning + Model Card Versioning →Section 9 of Kentucky CDPA establishes the Attorney General sole enforcement framework + closely modelled on VCDPA Virginia template. (1) Section 9 AG Sole Authority: (a) Attorney General exclusive enforcement;
KY-CDPA-Attorney-General-AG-Enforcement-Sole-30-Day-Cure-Period-7500-Civil-Penalty-Per-Violation · Kentucky CDPA Attorney General Enforcement + Sole Authority + 30-Day Cure Period + USD 7,500 Civil Penalty Per Violation + No Private Right of Action + Injunctive Relief + Attorneys' Fees + Section 9 Enforcement + Children's Data + Sensitive Data Heightened →Section 10 of KOSA establishes the enforcement framework limiting authority to FTC and State Attorneys General. (1) Section 10(a) FTC Federal Enforcement: (a) FTC has sole federal authority;
KOSA-Enforcement-FTC-Section10-State-AG-Sole-Civil-Penalty-43792-Per-Violation-No-Private-Right-of-Action · KOSA Enforcement + Section 10 + FTC Sole Federal Authority + State AG Concurrent + NO Private Right of Action + Civil Penalty up to USD 43,792 Per Violation + Injunctive Relief + State AG Notice to FTC + Multi-State Coordination + Cure Period for Smaller Platforms →Manage compliance and enforcement under Modern Slavery Act 2018 + responses to 2023 statutory review. Section 22 Minister powers - request explanation of non-compliance + publish information identifying non-compliant entities + Minister direction to comply.
AU-MSA-Enforcement-Section-22-Minister-Powers-No-Civil-Penalty-2023-McMillan-Review-Reform-2024-Anti-Slavery-Commissioner · Australia MSA Enforcement + Section 22 + Minister Powers + 2023 McMillan Review + 2024 Anti-Slavery Commissioner →VASPs must conduct periodic business risk assessments addressing operational, financial, and reputational risks.
CRM-4 · Business Risk Assessment →Questions people ask about reputational risk
What is Reputational Risk?
Why is Reputational Risk important for compliance?
Which compliance frameworks address Reputational Risk?
Where can I learn more about Reputational Risk?
See how Reputational Risk applies across compliance frameworks
Our platform maps 686 frameworks with 311K cross-framework control mappings. Explore how this concept is addressed across standards.