21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs NIST Privacy Framework 1.0
What is the difference between 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?
21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) is a other framework applying in the United States, with 25 controls across 7 domains. NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 is a privacy framework applying in the United States, with 8 controls across 8 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)25 controls
NIST Privacy Framework 1.08 controls
Questions people ask about 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0
What is the difference between 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?
21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) has 25 controls while NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 has 8 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) or NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs 21 CFR Part 211 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice21 shared controls21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs UK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements1 shared control21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange1 shared controlNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs South Korea ISMS-P7 shared controlsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)7 shared controlsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs Vietnam PDPD6 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.