ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics vs OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)
What is the difference between ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics is a ai & technology framework applying in ASEAN, with 37 controls across 7 domains. OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) is a ai & technology framework applying in International (OECD), with 8 controls across 8 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics37 controls
OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)8 controls
Questions people ask about ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)
What is the difference between ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics has 37 controls while OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) has 8 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics or OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics vs ISO/IEC 42001:202324 shared controlsASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics vs Singapore AI Governance Framework23 shared controlsASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics vs OECD AI Principles16 shared controlsOECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) vs Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)5 shared controlsOECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) vs Australia AI Ethics Framework4 shared controlsOECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) vs South Korea Korea Internet Self-Governance Organisation (KISO) Code of Ethics3 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.