Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs SOC 2
What is the difference between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and SOC 2?
Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) is a financial services framework applying in Australia, with 24 controls across 2 domains. SOC 2 is a other framework applying in the United States, with 61 controls across 5 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
Measured coverage between these frameworks
We map controls between these two frameworks in a knowledge graph and have a person review every mapping before it is published. Below is what that review found. The figures are read live from the graph, not written by hand.
Coverage is directional. Mapping A into B is a different measurement from B into A, because the two standards do not carry the same depth on the same subjects.
Questions people ask about Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and SOC 2
What is the difference between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and SOC 2?
Do I need both Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and SOC 2?
How do Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and SOC 2 controls map to each other?
Which framework should I implement first, Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) or SOC 2?
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and SOC 2 on our compliance platform.