BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)
What is the difference between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)?
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 is a other framework applying in International (GFSI-benchmarked), with 39 controls across 24 domains. ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) is a other framework applying in International (ICAO), with 10 controls across 10 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 939 controls
ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)10 controls
Questions people ask about BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)
What is the difference between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)?
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 has 39 controls while ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) has 10 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 or ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR)8 shared controlsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration7 shared controlsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ICH Q10 - Pharmaceutical Quality System6 shared controlsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements6 shared controlsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) vs IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security5 shared controlsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) vs OWASP ASVS4 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.