Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-146
What is the difference between Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management and NIST SP 800-146?
Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management is a risk management framework applying in Canada (Canadian Centre for Cyber Security), with 26 controls across 5 domains. NIST SP 800-146 is a information security framework applying in the United States, with 8 controls across 8 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management26 controls
NIST SP 800-1468 controls
Questions people ask about Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management and NIST SP 800-146
What is the difference between Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management and NIST SP 800-146?
Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management has 26 controls while NIST SP 800-146 has 8 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management and NIST SP 800-146?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management and NIST SP 800-146 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management and NIST SP 800-146 controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management and NIST SP 800-146 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management or NIST SP 800-146?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 523 shared controlsCanada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management vs ISO 270172 shared controlsCanada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)2 shared controlsNIST SP 800-146 vs IEC 624434 shared controlsNIST SP 800-146 vs OWASP MASVS4 shared controlsNIST SP 800-146 vs OWASP ASVS4 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management and NIST SP 800-146 on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.