COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) vs Virginia CDPA
What is the difference between COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) and Virginia CDPA?
COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) is a other framework applying in International, with 48 controls across 14 domains. Virginia CDPA is a other framework applying in the United States - Virginia, with 6 controls across 6 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)48 controls
Virginia CDPA6 controls
Questions people ask about COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) and Virginia CDPA
What is the difference between COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) and Virginia CDPA?
COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) has 48 controls while Virginia CDPA has 6 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) and Virginia CDPA?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) and Virginia CDPA so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) and Virginia CDPA controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) and Virginia CDPA at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) or Virginia CDPA?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) vs Vietnam PDPD4 shared controlsCOSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) vs Uruguay DPL4 shared controlsCOSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) vs UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation)4 shared controlsVirginia CDPA vs Barbados Data Protection Act 20194 shared controlsVirginia CDPA vs South Korea ISMS-P4 shared controlsVirginia CDPA vs GDPR4 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) and Virginia CDPA on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.