DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) vs SOC 2
What is the difference between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and SOC 2?
DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) is a other framework applying in the United States, with 22 controls across 5 domains. SOC 2 is a other framework applying in the United States, with 61 controls across 5 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)22 controls
SOC 261 controls
Questions people ask about DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and SOC 2
What is the difference between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and SOC 2?
DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) has 22 controls while SOC 2 has 61 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and SOC 2?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and SOC 2 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and SOC 2 controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and SOC 2 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) or SOC 2?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 55 shared controlsDISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) vs CIS Controls v81 shared controlSOC 2 vs ISO 27701:201947 shared controlsSOC 2 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 545 shared controlsSOC 2 vs C5 (Germany)39 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and SOC 2 on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.