DO-326A / ED-202A vs SOC 2

What is the difference between DO-326A / ED-202A and SOC 2?

DO-326A / ED-202A is a other framework applying in International (RTCA & EUROCAE). SOC 2 is a other framework applying in the United States, with 61 controls across 5 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.

DO-326A / ED-202A0 controls

SOC 261 controls

Questions people ask about DO-326A / ED-202A and SOC 2

What is the difference between DO-326A / ED-202A and SOC 2?

DO-326A / ED-202A while SOC 2 has 61 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.

Do I need both DO-326A / ED-202A and SOC 2?

Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between DO-326A / ED-202A and SOC 2 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.

How do DO-326A / ED-202A and SOC 2 controls map to each other?

Our platform maps controls between DO-326A / ED-202A and SOC 2 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.

Which framework should I implement first, DO-326A / ED-202A or SOC 2?

The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.