EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs ISO 27019
What is the difference between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and ISO 27019?
EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation is a information security framework applying in the European Union, with 34 controls across 3 domains. ISO 27019 is a information security framework applying in International, with 15 controls across 3 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation34 controls
ISO 2701915 controls
Questions people ask about EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and ISO 27019
What is the difference between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and ISO 27019?
EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation has 34 controls while ISO 27019 has 15 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and ISO 27019?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and ISO 27019 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and ISO 27019 controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and ISO 27019 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation or ISO 27019?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs South Korea ISMS-P9 shared controlsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)8 shared controlsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 shared controlsISO 27019 vs NIST SP 1800-3216 shared controlsISO 27019 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security15 shared controlsISO 27019 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 513 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and ISO 27019 on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.