EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs SOC 2
What is the difference between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and SOC 2?
EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation is a information security framework applying in the European Union, with 34 controls across 14 domains. SOC 2 is a other framework applying in the United States, with 61 controls across 5 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation34 controls
SOC 261 controls
Questions people ask about EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and SOC 2
What is the difference between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and SOC 2?
EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation has 34 controls while SOC 2 has 61 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and SOC 2?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and SOC 2 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and SOC 2 controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and SOC 2 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation or SOC 2?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs South Korea ISMS-P9 shared controlsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)8 shared controlsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 shared controlsSOC 2 vs ISO 27701:201947 shared controlsSOC 2 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 545 shared controlsSOC 2 vs C5 (Germany)39 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and SOC 2 on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.