FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation
What is the difference between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation is a information security framework applying in the United States (FAA), with 15 controls across 7 domains. EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation is a information security framework applying in the European Union, with 34 controls across 15 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation15 controls
EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation34 controls
Questions people ask about FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation
What is the difference between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 15 controls while EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation has 34 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation or EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs EU NIS2 Directive - Transport Sector Requirements3 shared controlsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)1 shared controlEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs South Korea ISMS-P9 shared controlsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)8 shared controlsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.