FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
What is the difference between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) is a information security framework applying in the United States (FFIEC), with 49 controls across 13 domains. HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) is a risk management framework applying in Hong Kong, with 11 controls across 7 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)49 controls
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)11 controls
Questions people ask about FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
What is the difference between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 49 controls while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 11 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) or HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification11 shared controlsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security10 shared controlsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)10 shared controlsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) - Higher Education Safeguards Rule3 shared controlsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs TEFCA - Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement3 shared controlsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)3 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.