FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
What is the difference between FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards is a other framework applying in International (FIRST - 107 countries), with 12 controls across 7 domains. HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) is a risk management framework applying in Hong Kong, with 96 controls across 8 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards12 controls
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)96 controls
Questions people ask about FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
What is the difference between FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards has 12 controls while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 96 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards or HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)3 shared controlsFIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards vs API 11642 shared controlsFIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)2 shared controlsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) - Higher Education Safeguards Rule3 shared controlsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs TEFCA - Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement3 shared controlsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)3 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between FIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.