HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems
What is the difference between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) is a risk management framework applying in Hong Kong, with 96 controls across 8 domains. NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems is a information security framework applying in the United States, with 8 controls across 8 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)96 controls
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems8 controls
Questions people ask about HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems
What is the difference between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 96 controls while NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems has 8 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) or NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) - Higher Education Safeguards Rule3 shared controlsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs TEFCA - Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement3 shared controlsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)3 shared controlsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements4 shared controlsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs OWASP ASVS4 shared controlsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs FedRAMP Rev 54 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.