HKMA TM-G-1 vs ISO 27001:2022

What is the difference between HKMA TM-G-1 and ISO 27001:2022?

HKMA TM-G-1 is a risk management framework applying in Hong Kong, with 8 controls across 7 domains. ISO 27001:2022 is a information security framework applying in International, with 93 controls across 6 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.

HKMA TM-G-18 controls

ISO 27001:202293 controls

Questions people ask about HKMA TM-G-1 and ISO 27001:2022

What is the difference between HKMA TM-G-1 and ISO 27001:2022?

HKMA TM-G-1 has 8 controls while ISO 27001:2022 has 93 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.

Do I need both HKMA TM-G-1 and ISO 27001:2022?

Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between HKMA TM-G-1 and ISO 27001:2022 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.

How do HKMA TM-G-1 and ISO 27001:2022 controls map to each other?

Our platform maps controls between HKMA TM-G-1 and ISO 27001:2022 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.

Which framework should I implement first, HKMA TM-G-1 or ISO 27001:2022?

The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.