HKMA TM-G-1 vs SOC 2

What is the difference between HKMA TM-G-1 and SOC 2?

HKMA TM-G-1 is a risk management framework applying in Hong Kong, with 8 controls across 7 domains. SOC 2 is a other framework applying in the United States, with 61 controls across 5 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.

HKMA TM-G-18 controls

SOC 261 controls

Questions people ask about HKMA TM-G-1 and SOC 2

What is the difference between HKMA TM-G-1 and SOC 2?

HKMA TM-G-1 has 8 controls while SOC 2 has 61 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.

Do I need both HKMA TM-G-1 and SOC 2?

Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between HKMA TM-G-1 and SOC 2 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.

How do HKMA TM-G-1 and SOC 2 controls map to each other?

Our platform maps controls between HKMA TM-G-1 and SOC 2 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.

Which framework should I implement first, HKMA TM-G-1 or SOC 2?

The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.