Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) vs GDPR
What is the difference between Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) and GDPR?
Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) is a privacy framework applying in Hong Kong, with 13 controls across 13 domains. GDPR is a privacy framework applying in the European Union, with 41 controls across 5 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486)13 controls
GDPR41 controls
Questions people ask about Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) and GDPR
What is the difference between Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) and GDPR?
Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) has 13 controls while GDPR has 41 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) and GDPR?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) and GDPR so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) and GDPR controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) and GDPR at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) or GDPR?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) vs Vermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA)2 shared controlsHong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) vs USMCA Chapter 19 - Digital Trade (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement)2 shared controlsHong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) vs TEFCA - Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement2 shared controlsGDPR vs ISO 27701:201933 shared controlsGDPR vs AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF)30 shared controlsGDPR vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 527 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) and GDPR on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.