IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification
What is the difference between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?
IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual is a other framework applying in International (IATA), with 9 controls across 9 domains. O-RAN WG11 Security Specification is a other framework applying in International (O-RAN Alliance), with 8 controls across 8 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual9 controls
O-RAN WG11 Security Specification8 controls
Questions people ask about IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification
What is the difference between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?
IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual has 9 controls while O-RAN WG11 Security Specification has 8 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual or O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 20242 shared controlsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs OWASP MASVS2 shared controlsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)2 shared controlsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)6 shared controlsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 shared controlsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification vs Open Banking Security5 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.