ISMAP (Japan) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)
What is the difference between ISMAP (Japan) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?
ISMAP (Japan) is a government framework applying in Japan, with 8 controls across 8 domains. AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) is a information security framework applying in the United States (AWWA), with 100 controls across 17 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
ISMAP (Japan)8 controls
AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)100 controls
Questions people ask about ISMAP (Japan) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)
What is the difference between ISMAP (Japan) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?
ISMAP (Japan) has 8 controls while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 100 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both ISMAP (Japan) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between ISMAP (Japan) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do ISMAP (Japan) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between ISMAP (Japan) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, ISMAP (Japan) or AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
ISMAP (Japan) vs OWASP ASVS5 shared controlsISMAP (Japan) vs MITRE D3FEND5 shared controlsISMAP (Japan) vs BSI IT-Grundschutz5 shared controlsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 shared controlsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security12 shared controlsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs SLSA11 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between ISMAP (Japan) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.