ISO 27799 vs MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges
What is the difference between ISO 27799 and MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?
ISO 27799 is a information security framework applying in International, with 73 controls across 4 domains. MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges is a other framework applying in the United States, with 8 controls across 8 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
ISO 2779973 controls
MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges8 controls
Questions people ask about ISO 27799 and MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges
What is the difference between ISO 27799 and MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?
ISO 27799 has 73 controls while MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges has 8 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both ISO 27799 and MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between ISO 27799 and MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do ISO 27799 and MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between ISO 27799 and MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, ISO 27799 or MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
ISO 27799 vs NIST SP 800-6612 shared controlsISO 27799 vs MDS2 (Medical Device)12 shared controlsISO 27799 vs NIST Privacy Framework11 shared controlsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs Turkey KVKK7 shared controlsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)7 shared controlsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs ISO 270187 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between ISO 27799 and MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.