ISO 56002 vs ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations
What is the difference between ISO 56002 and ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations?
ISO 56002 is a other framework applying in International. ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations is a other framework applying in the United States (State Department), with 8 controls across 8 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
ISO 560020 controls
ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations8 controls
Questions people ask about ISO 56002 and ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations
What is the difference between ISO 56002 and ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations?
ISO 56002 while ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations has 8 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both ISO 56002 and ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between ISO 56002 and ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do ISO 56002 and ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between ISO 56002 and ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, ISO 56002 or ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
ISO 56002 vs ICH Q10 - Pharmaceutical Quality System3 shared controlsISO 56002 vs AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF)3 shared controlsISO 56002 vs Singapore Cybersecurity Act 20182 shared controlsITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations vs South Korea ISMS-P4 shared controlsITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations vs DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)4 shared controlsITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements4 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between ISO 56002 and ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.