ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations vs COBIT 2019
What is the difference between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and COBIT 2019?
ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations is a compliance framework applying in the United States (State Department), with 99 controls across 10 domains. COBIT 2019 is a compliance framework applying in International, with 231 controls across 5 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations99 controls
COBIT 2019231 controls
Questions people ask about ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and COBIT 2019
What is the difference between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and COBIT 2019?
ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations has 99 controls while COBIT 2019 has 231 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and COBIT 2019?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and COBIT 2019 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and COBIT 2019 controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and COBIT 2019 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations or COBIT 2019?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations vs South Korea ISMS-P4 shared controlsITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations vs DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)4 shared controlsITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements4 shared controlsCOBIT 2019 vs MTCS (Singapore)2 shared controlsCOBIT 2019 vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 20242 shared controlsCOBIT 2019 vs PSD2 SCA2 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and COBIT 2019 on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.