ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations vs French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)
What is the difference between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?
ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations is a other framework applying in the United States (State Department), with 99 controls across 10 domains. French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) is a other framework applying in France, with 20 controls across 6 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations99 controls
French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)20 controls
Questions people ask about ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)
What is the difference between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?
ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations has 99 controls while French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) has 20 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations or French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations vs South Korea ISMS-P4 shared controlsITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations vs DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)4 shared controlsITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements4 shared controlsFrench Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 53 shared controlsFrench Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) vs UAE Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) Regulations3 shared controlsFrench Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) vs PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR)3 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.