MDS2 (Medical Device) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)
What is the difference between MDS2 (Medical Device) and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?
MDS2 (Medical Device) is a other framework applying in the United States, with 8 controls across 8 domains. OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) is a other framework applying in International, with 6 controls across 6 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
MDS2 (Medical Device)8 controls
OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)6 controls
Questions people ask about MDS2 (Medical Device) and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)
What is the difference between MDS2 (Medical Device) and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?
MDS2 (Medical Device) has 8 controls while OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) has 6 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both MDS2 (Medical Device) and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between MDS2 (Medical Device) and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do MDS2 (Medical Device) and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between MDS2 (Medical Device) and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, MDS2 (Medical Device) or OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
MDS2 (Medical Device) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 shared controlsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)5 shared controlsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)5 shared controlsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1466 shared controlsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs ISMAP (Japan)6 shared controlsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1456 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between MDS2 (Medical Device) and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.