Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers
What is the difference between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?
Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) is a other framework applying in Australia, with 7 controls across 7 domains. UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers is a other framework applying in the United Kingdom (MOD), with 30 controls across 11 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)7 controls
UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers30 controls
Questions people ask about Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers
What is the difference between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?
Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) has 7 controls while UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers has 30 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) or UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)3 shared controlsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs South Korea ISMS-P3 shared controlsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs API 11642 shared controlsUK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives4 shared controlsUK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs PSD2 SCA4 shared controlsUK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs OSFI B-134 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.