NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements
What is the difference between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?
NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) is a other framework applying in the United States (NAIC), with 42 controls across 8 domains. NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements is a information security framework applying in the United States (NIST). They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)42 controls
NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements0 controls
Questions people ask about NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements
What is the difference between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?
NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) has 42 controls while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) or NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs OWASP MASVS4 shared controlsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs OWASP ASVS4 shared controlsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs South Korea ISMS-P4 shared controlsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security20 shared controlsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea ISMS-P20 shared controlsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 518 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.