NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) vs GDPR
What is the difference between NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and GDPR?
NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) is a information security framework applying in the United States, with 8 controls across 8 domains. GDPR is a privacy framework applying in the European Union, with 27 controls across 13 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment)8 controls
GDPR27 controls
Questions people ask about NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and GDPR
What is the difference between NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and GDPR?
NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) has 8 controls while GDPR has 27 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and GDPR?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and GDPR so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and GDPR controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and GDPR at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) or GDPR?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) vs OWASP MASVS4 shared controlsNIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)4 shared controlsNIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) vs OWASP ASVS4 shared controlsGDPR vs ISO 27701:201933 shared controlsGDPR vs AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF)30 shared controlsGDPR vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 527 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and GDPR on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.