NIST SP 800-30 vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation
What is the difference between NIST SP 800-30 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
NIST SP 800-30 is a information security framework applying in the United States, with 8 controls across 8 domains. EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation is a information security framework applying in the European Union, with 34 controls across 15 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
NIST SP 800-308 controls
EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation34 controls
Questions people ask about NIST SP 800-30 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation
What is the difference between NIST SP 800-30 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
NIST SP 800-30 has 8 controls while EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation has 34 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both NIST SP 800-30 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between NIST SP 800-30 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do NIST SP 800-30 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between NIST SP 800-30 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, NIST SP 800-30 or EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
NIST SP 800-30 vs ISO 270196 shared controlsNIST SP 800-30 vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers6 shared controlsNIST SP 800-30 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements6 shared controlsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs South Korea ISMS-P9 shared controlsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)8 shared controlsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between NIST SP 800-30 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.