NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs GLBA
What is the difference between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and GLBA?
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems is a information security framework applying in the United States, with 8 controls across 8 domains. GLBA is a other framework applying in the United States, with 12 controls across 7 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems8 controls
GLBA12 controls
Questions people ask about NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and GLBA
What is the difference between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and GLBA?
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems has 8 controls while GLBA has 12 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and GLBA?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and GLBA so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and GLBA controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and GLBA at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems or GLBA?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements4 shared controlsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs OWASP ASVS4 shared controlsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs FedRAMP Rev 54 shared controlsGLBA vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 20244 shared controlsGLBA vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)4 shared controlsGLBA vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)4 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and GLBA on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.