NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
What is the difference between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems is a information security framework applying in the United States, with 8 controls across 8 domains. HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) is a risk management framework applying in Hong Kong, with 11 controls across 7 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems8 controls
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)11 controls
Questions people ask about NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
What is the difference between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems has 8 controls while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 11 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems or HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements4 shared controlsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs OWASP ASVS4 shared controlsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs FedRAMP Rev 54 shared controlsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) - Higher Education Safeguards Rule3 shared controlsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs TEFCA - Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement3 shared controlsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)3 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.