NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs ISO 27001:2022
What is the difference between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and ISO 27001:2022?
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems is a information security framework applying in the United States, with 8 controls across 8 domains. ISO 27001:2022 is a information security framework applying in International, with 93 controls across 6 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems8 controls
ISO 27001:202293 controls
Questions people ask about NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and ISO 27001:2022
What is the difference between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and ISO 27001:2022?
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems has 8 controls while ISO 27001:2022 has 93 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and ISO 27001:2022?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and ISO 27001:2022 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and ISO 27001:2022 controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and ISO 27001:2022 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems or ISO 27001:2022?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements4 shared controlsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs OWASP ASVS4 shared controlsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs FedRAMP Rev 54 shared controlsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 585 shared controlsISO 27001:2022 vs FedRAMP Moderate79 shared controlsISO 27001:2022 vs FedRAMP High79 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and ISO 27001:2022 on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.