OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) vs ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics
What is the difference between OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?
OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) is a ai & technology framework applying in International (OECD), with 8 controls across 8 domains. ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics is a ai & technology framework applying in ASEAN, with 37 controls across 7 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)8 controls
ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics37 controls
Questions people ask about OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics
What is the difference between OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?
OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) has 8 controls while ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics has 37 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) or ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) vs Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)5 shared controlsOECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) vs Australia AI Ethics Framework4 shared controlsOECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) vs South Korea Korea Internet Self-Governance Organisation (KISO) Code of Ethics3 shared controlsASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics vs ISO/IEC 42001:202324 shared controlsASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics vs Singapore AI Governance Framework23 shared controlsASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics vs OECD AI Principles16 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.