OSFI B-13 vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation
What is the difference between OSFI B-13 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
OSFI B-13 is a risk management framework applying in Canada, with 8 controls across 8 domains. EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation is a information security framework applying in the European Union, with 34 controls across 15 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
OSFI B-138 controls
EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation34 controls
Questions people ask about OSFI B-13 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation
What is the difference between OSFI B-13 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
OSFI B-13 has 8 controls while EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation has 34 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both OSFI B-13 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between OSFI B-13 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do OSFI B-13 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between OSFI B-13 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, OSFI B-13 or EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
OSFI B-13 vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 20245 shared controlsOSFI B-13 vs UK Open Banking Standard5 shared controlsOSFI B-13 vs ISO 270195 shared controlsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs South Korea ISMS-P9 shared controlsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)8 shared controlsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between OSFI B-13 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.