OWASP MASVS vs NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment)
What is the difference between OWASP MASVS and NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment)?
OWASP MASVS is a other framework applying in International, with 8 controls across 8 domains. NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) is a information security framework applying in the United States, with 8 controls across 8 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
OWASP MASVS8 controls
NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment)8 controls
Questions people ask about OWASP MASVS and NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment)
What is the difference between OWASP MASVS and NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment)?
OWASP MASVS has 8 controls while NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) has 8 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both OWASP MASVS and NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment)?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between OWASP MASVS and NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do OWASP MASVS and NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between OWASP MASVS and NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, OWASP MASVS or NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment)?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
OWASP MASVS vs ISO 270177 shared controlsOWASP MASVS vs ISO 270437 shared controlsOWASP MASVS vs ISO 270187 shared controlsNIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)4 shared controlsNIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) vs OWASP ASVS4 shared controlsNIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) vs ISO 270434 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between OWASP MASVS and NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.