Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 vs SIG (Shared Assessments)
What is the difference between Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 and SIG (Shared Assessments)?
Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 is a information security framework applying in Singapore, with 26 controls across 6 domains. SIG (Shared Assessments) is a other framework applying in International, with 25 controls across 2 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
Singapore Cybersecurity Act 201826 controls
SIG (Shared Assessments)25 controls
Questions people ask about Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 and SIG (Shared Assessments)
What is the difference between Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 and SIG (Shared Assessments)?
Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 has 26 controls while SIG (Shared Assessments) has 25 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 and SIG (Shared Assessments)?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 and SIG (Shared Assessments) so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 and SIG (Shared Assessments) controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 and SIG (Shared Assessments) at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 or SIG (Shared Assessments)?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)3 shared controlsSingapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)3 shared controlsSingapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 vs Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)2 shared controlsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)4 shared controlsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices4 shared controlsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs ISO 270434 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 and SIG (Shared Assessments) on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.