SOC 1 (SSAE 18 / ISAE 3402) vs PCI DSS v4.0

What is the difference between SOC 1 (SSAE 18 / ISAE 3402) and PCI DSS v4.0?

SOC 1 (SSAE 18 / ISAE 3402) is a other framework applying in the United States (AICPA) and International (ISAE 3402), with 32 controls across 11 domains. PCI DSS v4.0 is a financial services framework applying in International, with 63 controls across 12 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.

SOC 1 (SSAE 18 / ISAE 3402)32 controls

PCI DSS v4.063 controls

Questions people ask about SOC 1 (SSAE 18 / ISAE 3402) and PCI DSS v4.0

What is the difference between SOC 1 (SSAE 18 / ISAE 3402) and PCI DSS v4.0?

SOC 1 (SSAE 18 / ISAE 3402) has 32 controls while PCI DSS v4.0 has 63 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.

Do I need both SOC 1 (SSAE 18 / ISAE 3402) and PCI DSS v4.0?

Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between SOC 1 (SSAE 18 / ISAE 3402) and PCI DSS v4.0 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.

How do SOC 1 (SSAE 18 / ISAE 3402) and PCI DSS v4.0 controls map to each other?

Our platform maps controls between SOC 1 (SSAE 18 / ISAE 3402) and PCI DSS v4.0 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.

Which framework should I implement first, SOC 1 (SSAE 18 / ISAE 3402) or PCI DSS v4.0?

The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.