Solvency II vs SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination
What is the difference between Solvency II and SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?
Solvency II is a risk management framework applying in the European Union, with 60 controls across 15 domains. SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination is a information security framework applying in the United States (AICPA), with 22 controls across 8 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
Solvency II60 controls
SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination22 controls
Questions people ask about Solvency II and SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination
What is the difference between Solvency II and SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?
Solvency II has 60 controls while SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination has 22 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both Solvency II and SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between Solvency II and SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do Solvency II and SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between Solvency II and SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, Solvency II or SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
Solvency II vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)5 shared controlsSolvency II vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange4 shared controlsSolvency II vs Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)4 shared controlsSOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)10 shared controlsSOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange9 shared controlsSOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs UK AI Regulation Framework7 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between Solvency II and SOC for Cybersecurity - Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.