Skip to content

Evidence request lists

GHG Protocol

Evidence request list. 12 controls, 12 carrying auditor artefact guidance. Generated from the compliance knowledge graph on 11 September 2026. Published by The Art of Service.

GHG Protocol: Coordination with SBTi + CDP + CSRD/ESRS E1 + ISSB IFRS S2 + ISO 14064 + 2024-2025 Updates

GHG-Coord-EU-Taxonomy-CSDDD-EU-ETS
Coordination with EU Taxonomy, CSDDD, EU ETS and Other Climate Regulatory Frameworks

GHG Protocol coordination with EU + regulatory climate frameworks. EU TAXONOMY REGULATION (Regulation (EU) 2020/852): 6 environmental objectives; Climate Change Mitigation + Climate Change Adaptation primary climate objectives; TECHNICAL SCREENING CRITERIA require GHG performance + footprint reductions per GHG Protocol methodology; financial entities + non-financial companies disclose Taxonomy-eligible + Taxonomy-aligned share. EU CSDDD (Directive (EU) 2024/1760): MANDATORY CLIMATE TRANSITION PLAN + 1.5C alignment + scope including Scope 3; GHG Protocol foundational. EU ETS (Emission Trading System) Directive 2003/87/EC: covered installations + maritime + aviation must report verified emissions to authorities + buy allowances; verified per accredited verifiers + GHG Protocol + ISO 14064-3 + AVR (Accreditation and Verification Regulation); CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, EU 2023

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Multi-jurisdictional climate compliance program
  • Reporting submissions
  • CBAM compliance + reporting
Where this commonly fails
  • Multi-jurisdictional compliance gaps
  • Disclosure submissions inconsistent
  • CBAM not addressed
GHG-Coord-SBTi-CDP-CSRD-ISSB
Coordination with SBTi, CDP, CSRD/ESRS E1, ISSB IFRS S2, ISO 14064 and Climate Frameworks

GHG Protocol coordination with adjacent climate + sustainability frameworks. SBTi (SCIENCE BASED TARGETS INITIATIVE): GHG Protocol is the foundational accounting framework for SBTi target-setting + tracking; SBTi requires Scope 1/2/3 inventories + 1.5C / well-below-2C aligned reduction targets + net-zero commitments + annual progress tracking; SBTi has 4 reduction tier methods (Sectoral Decarbonization Approach SDA + Absolute Contraction + ACA + Renewable Energy + others) + Net-Zero Standard. CDP (CARBON DISCLOSURE PROJECT): annual corporate disclosure platform; questionnaire aligned with GHG Protocol + ISSB + TCFD; rated A-F; ~25,000 companies disclose annually; cdp.net. EU CSRD + ESRS E1 (CLIMATE CHANGE): GHG Protocol Scope 1/2/3 inventories + reduction targets + transition plans + double materiality assessment mandatory under CSRD; ESRS E1 datapoints include 26 disclosure requirements

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Multi-framework alignment + crosswalks
  • SBTi + CDP + CSRD + ISSB submissions
  • ISO 14064 + PCAF + sector-specific
  • Verification + assurance program
Where this commonly fails
  • Multi-framework alignment ad-hoc
  • SBTi + CDP + CSRD + ISSB submissions missed
  • ISO 14064 + PCAF not used
  • Verification gaps
GHG-Crosswalk-ISO-14064-PCAF-Sectoral
Crosswalk to ISO 14064-1/2/3, PCAF, Sectoral Standards and Climate Disclosure Frameworks

GHG Protocol crosswalk to international climate accounting + sectoral standards. ISO 14064-1:2018 (ORGANIZATION-LEVEL) - conceptually aligned with GHG Protocol Corporate Standard + Scope 2 + Scope 3; differs in: (a) ISO uses 'direct + indirect + other indirect' rather than Scope 1/2/3; (b) more prescriptive on verification (ISO 14064-3); (c) less detailed on Scope 3 categories. ISO 14064-2:2019 (PROJECT-LEVEL) - aligned with GHG Project Protocol; carbon offset + project quantification. ISO 14064-3:2019 (VERIFICATION) - third-party verification methodology; widely used for GHG inventory assurance + verification statements. ISO 14067:2018 (PRODUCT CARBON FOOTPRINT) - aligned with GHG Product Life Cycle Standard. ISO 14068-1:2023 (CARBON NEUTRALITY) - aligned with SBTi Net Zero + GHG Protocol. PCAF (PARTNERSHIP FOR CARBON ACCOUNTING FINANCIALS): financial-sector Scope 3 Category 15 financed

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • ISO 14064 + 14067 cross-mapping
  • PCAF compliance for financial entities
  • Sectoral standards alignment
  • Multi-framework disclosure adoption
Where this commonly fails
  • ISO alignment not maintained
  • PCAF not used
  • Sectoral standards ignored
  • Multi-framework disclosure siloed
GHG-Implementation-Roadmap-Inventory
GHG Protocol Implementation - Inventory Process, Organizational Roles and Tooling

GHG Protocol implementation roadmap. INVENTORY PROCESS (annual cycle): (1) DEFINE GOAL + AUDIENCE - business goals + stakeholders + reporting standards; (2) SET BOUNDARIES - organisational (equity/financial/operational control) + operational (Scope 1/2/3); (3) IDENTIFY EMISSION SOURCES - all activities + sources per scope + category; (4) COLLECT ACTIVITY DATA - fuel consumption + electricity + travel + procurement + waste + commuting + investments + etc.; (5) SELECT EMISSION FACTORS - IPCC + EPA + EEA + national + supplier-specific + REC/GoO + LCA databases (ecoinvent + GaBi + Sphera); (6) CALCULATE EMISSIONS - tCO2e via activity x factor x GWP; (7) QUALITY ASSURANCE - data quality assessment + uncertainty + internal review; (8) DOCUMENT + REPORT - inventory report + emissions statement + base year + recalculation + assurance; (9) VERIFY - external limited or reasonable assurance; (10) D

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Inventory process documentation
  • Role inventory + RACI
  • Tooling adoption + data integration
  • Metrics + management review
Where this commonly fails
  • Inventory cycle ad-hoc
  • Roles undefined
  • Tooling fragmented
  • Metrics not tracked
GHG-Status-2024-2025-Update-AI-Land
Status, 2024-2025 Update Pipeline, AI/ML Emissions, Land Sector + Removals Guidance 2025

GHG Protocol status + 2024-2025 update pipeline. STATUS: GHG Protocol Suite established 1998 + active maintenance by WRI + WBCSD + Independent Standards Board + Technical Working Groups; freely available + downloadable from ghgprotocol.org. CURRENT EDITIONS: Corporate Standard (2004 revised); Scope 2 Guidance (2015); Corporate Value Chain Standard (2011); Product Life Cycle Standard (2011); Project Protocol (2005); Mitigation Goal Standard (2014); Policy and Action Standard (2014); Land Sector + Removals Guidance (2025). 2024-2025 UPDATE PIPELINE: comprehensive consultation underway (2022-2025) for major Corporate Standard + Scope 2 Guidance + Scope 3 Standard updates; new editions anticipated 2026-2027; KEY UPDATE AREAS: (a) AI + machine learning emissions - data centre + training + inference + cooling + embodied emissions of hardware; (b) CLOUD COMPUTING - shared infrastructure + virtu

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Consultation participation + readiness
  • Update-pipeline tracking + impact assessment
  • Transition plan for new editions
Where this commonly fails
  • Consultation not engaged
  • Update pipeline not tracked
  • Transition plan absent
GHG-Status-Adoption-Sectoral
GHG Protocol Adoption Status and Sectoral Application 2024-2025

GHG Protocol adoption + sectoral application. ADOPTION: GHG Protocol is the GLOBAL DEFAULT for corporate GHG accounting; estimated >9 in 10 of Fortune 500 companies + most Global 2000 use GHG Protocol; underpins CDP (~25,000 corporate disclosures annually); SBTi (1,500+ companies with science-based targets); CSRD ESRS E1 (~50,000 EU + non-EU companies under CSRD scope from 2024-2028); ISSB IFRS S2 (emerging global baseline). SECTORAL APPLICATION: (a) OIL + GAS - IPIECA + API Compendium + IOGP sector guidance; (b) MANUFACTURING - WBCSD Cement Sustainability Initiative + ISO 14064 + sector-specific (steel + chemicals + paper); (c) FINANCIAL SERVICES - PCAF financed emissions methodology; (d) TECH + DATA CENTRES - Climate Neutral Data Centre Pact + Open Compute Project Sustainability + iMasons Climate Accord; (e) AGRICULTURE + FOOD - FLAG (Forest + Land + Agriculture) standard + SBTi FLAG;

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Sectoral framework alignment
  • Industry-specific guidance adoption
  • Emerging sector readiness
Where this commonly fails
  • Sectoral framework alignment ad-hoc
  • Industry-specific guidance ignored
  • Emerging sector readiness gap

GHG Protocol: Data Quality, Uncertainty, External Verification and Disclosure

GHG-DataQuality-Verification-Disclosure
Data Quality, Uncertainty, External Verification and Public Disclosure

GHG Protocol data quality + verification + disclosure. DATA QUALITY: 5 dimensions per GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard - (1) TECHNOLOGY representativeness; (2) TEMPORAL representativeness; (3) GEOGRAPHICAL representativeness; (4) COMPLETENESS; (5) RELIABILITY (accuracy + precision). UNCERTAINTY ASSESSMENT: quantitative uncertainty analysis for activity data + emission factors + GWP + model uncertainty; typically Monte Carlo or pedigree approaches; uncertainty disclosure required for Scope 1/2/3. EXTERNAL VERIFICATION: limited or reasonable assurance by independent third-party verifier per ISO 14064-3 + ISAE 3000/3410 + similar; SCOPE of verification: organisational boundary + operational boundary + Scope 1 + Scope 2 + Scope 3 + reporting principles + data integrity + calculation methods + emission factor application; INCREASINGLY MANDATORY: EU CSRD + ESRS E1 require limited assurance + reas

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Data quality assessment per source
  • Uncertainty quantification + disclosure
  • External verification + assurance reports
  • CDP + CSRD submissions
Where this commonly fails
  • Data quality not assessed
  • Uncertainty not disclosed
  • External verification absent
  • CDP + CSRD submissions skipped

GHG Protocol: Organisational and Operational Boundaries, Base Year and Recalculation

GHG-Boundaries-BaseYear-Recalc
Organisational + Operational Boundaries, Base Year and Recalculation

GHG Protocol boundaries + base year + recalculation. ORGANISATIONAL BOUNDARIES (3 approaches): (a) EQUITY SHARE - account for GHG emissions according to share of equity in operation; (b) FINANCIAL CONTROL - account for emissions from operations where financial control is exercised + ability to direct financial + operating policies; (c) OPERATIONAL CONTROL - account for emissions from operations where operational control is exercised + authority to introduce + implement operating policies; (d) HYBRID approaches permitted with disclosure; (e) JOINT VENTURES + PARTNERSHIPS + SUBSIDIARIES + FRANCHISES + LEASED ASSETS + INTERCOMPANY TRANSACTIONS handled per chosen approach. OPERATIONAL BOUNDARIES (Scope 1/2/3 classification): see separate Scope controls. BASE YEAR: a specified year or average of years against which an emissions are tracked over time; selection criteria - representative + reli

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Boundary approach documentation
  • Base year + recalculation policy
  • Recalculation execution records
Where this commonly fails
  • Boundary approach inconsistent
  • Base year not justified
  • Recalculation policy missing or weak

GHG Protocol: Scope 1 Direct Emissions (Stationary + Mobile + Process + Fugitive)

GHG-Scope1-Direct
Scope 1 Direct Emissions - Stationary + Mobile Combustion + Process + Fugitive

GHG Protocol Scope 1 - direct emissions from sources owned or controlled by the company. 4 SUB-CATEGORIES: (1) STATIONARY COMBUSTION - emissions from combustion of fuels in stationary equipment including boilers + furnaces + burners + turbines + heaters + incinerators + engines + flares + ovens + dryers + and other stationary processes; FUELS include natural gas + coal + oil + biomass + biofuels + waste-derived fuels + hydrogen; CALCULATION via fuel consumption x emission factor (IPCC + national + manufacturer + EPA Mandatory Reporting Rule + EEA + others); (2) MOBILE COMBUSTION - emissions from transportation in mobile sources including company-owned/controlled vehicles + trucks + ships + planes + trains + machinery; FUELS include gasoline + diesel + jet kerosene + biofuels + LPG + CNG + LNG + hydrogen; CALCULATION via fuel-based or distance-based methods; (3) PROCESS EMISSIONS - emissi

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Scope 1 inventory + activity data
  • Emission factor sources documented
  • GWP version + recalculation policy
Where this commonly fails
  • Scope 1 sources missed
  • Emission factor sources unclear
  • GWP outdated

GHG Protocol: Scope 2 Indirect Energy Emissions (Location-Based + Market-Based Dual Reporting)

GHG-Scope2-Dual-Reporting
Scope 2 Indirect Energy Emissions - Location-Based + Market-Based Dual Reporting (2015 Guidance)

GHG Protocol Scope 2 - indirect emissions from purchased electricity + steam + heating + cooling. Per the 2015 SCOPE 2 GUIDANCE, organizations must report Scope 2 using BOTH LOCATION-BASED + MARKET-BASED methods (DUAL REPORTING). PURCHASED ENERGY TYPES: (1) ELECTRICITY from utility grid; (2) STEAM from district energy or third-party generators; (3) HEATING from district heating networks; (4) COOLING from district cooling networks. LOCATION-BASED METHOD: emissions based on average emission factor of the local grid where energy is consumed; uses regional/national/sub-national grid average emission factors (e.g. EPA eGRID for US + UK BEIS + EU AIB + International Energy Agency for non-OECD); reflects physical electricity grid mix. MARKET-BASED METHOD: emissions based on contractual instruments + market choices including REC (Renewable Energy Certificates) + Guarantees of Origin (GoOs) + Pow

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Location-based + market-based calculations
  • REC/GoO/PPA procurement records
  • Quality criteria adherence
  • Dual-reporting evidence
Where this commonly fails
  • Single-method reporting (PROHIBITED)
  • Market-based instruments low quality
  • Dual reporting missing
  • Quality criteria gaps

GHG Protocol: Scope 3 Value Chain Emissions (15 Categories, Upstream + Downstream)

GHG-Scope3-Value-Chain-15Categories
Scope 3 Value Chain Emissions - 15 Categories (8 Upstream + 7 Downstream)

GHG Protocol Scope 3 - indirect value-chain emissions across 15 CATEGORIES per the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard 2011. 8 UPSTREAM CATEGORIES: (1) PURCHASED GOODS AND SERVICES - cradle-to-gate emissions of products and services purchased; typically largest Scope 3 source; (2) CAPITAL GOODS - cradle-to-gate emissions of capital goods purchased + amortized over useful life or expense year; (3) FUEL- AND ENERGY-RELATED ACTIVITIES NOT IN SCOPE 1 OR 2 - upstream emissions of purchased fuels + electricity + transmission and distribution losses + WTT (well-to-tank); (4) UPSTREAM TRANSPORTATION AND DISTRIBUTION - emissions from transportation + distribution of purchased products + outbound logistics paid by reporting company; (5) WASTE GENERATED IN OPERATIONS - disposal + treatment of waste; (6) BUSINESS TRAVEL - employee business travel by air + rail + road + sea; (7) EMPLOYEE COMMUTI

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Scope 3 inventory + 15 categories
  • Materiality assessment + screening
  • Per-category methodology documentation
Where this commonly fails
  • Scope 3 categories missed
  • Materiality assessment skipped
  • Methodology inconsistent
  • Financial-sector PCAF not used

GHG Protocol: Suite Overview, Corporate Standard and Reporting Principles

GHG-Suite-Corporate-Principles
GHG Protocol Suite, Corporate Standard and 5 Reporting Principles

GHG Protocol Suite + Corporate Standard + 5 Reporting Principles. SUITE: (a) Corporate Standard (2004) - foundational entity-level; (b) Scope 2 Guidance (2015); (c) Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard (2011); (d) Product Life Cycle Standard (2011); (e) Project Protocol (2005); (f) Mitigation Goal Standard (2014); (g) Policy and Action Standard (2014); (h) Land Sector + Removals Guidance (2025). 5 REPORTING PRINCIPLES (foundational to all GHG Protocol standards): (1) RELEVANCE - inventory reflects GHG emissions of company + serves user decision needs; (2) COMPLETENESS - account for + report all GHG emission sources + activities within chosen inventory boundary + disclose + justify exclusions; (3) CONSISTENCY - use consistent methodologies + boundaries + base year + data quality + transparently document any changes; (4) TRANSPARENCY - report in factual + neutral manner sufficient for

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • GHG suite implementation plan
  • Reporting principles documentation
  • Multi-standard cross-reference
Where this commonly fails
  • Suite components misunderstood
  • Principles applied superficially
  • Multi-standard alignment gaps
Assembled from the framework's own control set. Every line traces to a control in the graph, so this pack is regenerated rather than written, and stays current as the graph does.

Assembled from the framework’s own control set, so this list is regenerated rather than written and stays current as the graph does. See the GHG Protocol framework page.