Skip to content

Evidence request lists

Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)

Evidence request list. 8 controls, 8 carrying auditor artefact guidance. Generated from the compliance knowledge graph on 12 September 2026. Published by The Art of Service.

Enforcement and 2024 Anti-Slavery Commissioner - Australia MSA 2018

AU-MSA-Enforcement-Section-22-Minister-Powers-No-Civil-Penalty-2023-McMillan-Review-Reform-2024-Anti-Slavery-Commissioner
Australia MSA Enforcement + Section 22 + Minister Powers + 2023 McMillan Review + 2024 Anti-Slavery Commissioner

Manage compliance and enforcement under Modern Slavery Act 2018 + responses to 2023 statutory review. Section 22 Minister powers - request explanation of non-compliance + publish information identifying non-compliant entities + Minister direction to comply. CRITICAL GAP - NO civil or criminal penalties under current Act (significant criticism + civil society advocacy for reform). Reputational risk only as primary enforcement mechanism. Naming and shaming via published non-compliance + media + civil society + ESG investor pressure (Modern Slavery Investor Coalition + KnowTheChain Investors + Workforce Disclosure Initiative). McMillan Statutory Review March 2023 + Report August 2023 + 30 recommendations including: introduce civil penalties for non-compliance (up to AUD 600,000 for entities) + lower revenue threshold to AUD 50 million + establish independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner (DONE

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Section 22 Minister explanation response (where applicable)
  • Reputational risk monitoring (Modern Slavery Investor Coalition + KnowTheChain + Workforce Disclosure Initiative)
  • McMillan Review 30 recommendation readiness (civil penalties up to AUD 600K + AUD 50M threshold + mandatory due diligence + worst-forms child labour duty + KPIs)
  • Anti-Slavery Commissioner Office liaison records (Chris Evans inaugural Commissioner December 2024)
  • AFP Modern Slavery and Vulnerable Persons Team coordination protocol
  • NSW Anti-Slavery Commissioner state coordination evidence
  • International coordination Bali Process + ILO + UN GIFT participation
Where this commonly fails
  • No reputational risk monitoring (under-prepared for civil society naming)
  • McMillan Review reform readiness gap (especially mandatory due diligence)
  • Anti-Slavery Commissioner Office not engaged for guidance
  • AFP coordination protocol absent for serious incidents

Mandatory Criteria 1 and 2 - Identity and Structure - Australia MSA 2018

AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criteria-1-2-Identity-Structure-Operations-Supply-Chain-Section-16-1a-16-1b
Australia MSA Mandatory Criteria 1 + 2 + Identity + Structure + Operations + Supply Chain + Section 16(1)(a) + (b)

Address Mandatory Criteria 1 and 2 of Modern Slavery Statement under Section 16(1)(a) and (b). Criterion 1 - Identify the reporting entity: legal name + ACN/ARBN + ABN + registered office address + nature of business + financial year + reporting period. Criterion 2 - Describe the structure operations and supply chains of the reporting entity: corporate structure including parent + subsidiaries + joint ventures + branches + operations across geographies including manufacturing + retail + services + procurement + logistics + supply chains including Tier 1 direct suppliers + Tier 2/3+ indirect suppliers + total supplier count + supplier categories + supplier geographic distribution + supplier industry sectors + supplier longevity. Mapping should align with International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) + ANZSIC Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification + Harmoni

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Criterion 1 entity identification (legal name + ACN/ARBN + ABN + registered office + business nature)
  • Criterion 2 structure (parent + subsidiaries + JVs + branches + operations)
  • Supply chain mapping including Tier 1 + Tier 2/3+ + supplier count + geographic distribution + industry sectors
  • Worker types disclosure (direct + indirect + contractors + casual + migrant + visa workers)
  • ISIC + ANZSIC industry classification + HS codes alignment
Where this commonly fails
  • Tier 2/3+ supplier visibility limited to direct suppliers
  • Worker types disclosure incomplete (missing labour-hire + agency)
  • Supplier geographic distribution at country level only (missing region)
  • Structure description omits joint ventures or branches

Mandatory Criteria 6 and 7 - Consultation Other Information and Governance - Australia MSA 2018

AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-6-7-Consultation-Section-16-1f-1g-Joint-Statement-Other-Information-Governance
Australia MSA Mandatory Criteria 6 + 7 + Consultation + Joint Statement + Section 16(1)(f) + (g) + Governance

Address Mandatory Criteria 6 and 7 of Modern Slavery Statement under Section 16(1)(f) and (g) + governance arrangements. Criterion 6 - Describe process of consultation with entities owned/controlled by reporting entity + (where joint statement) with reporting entities covered by the statement. Consultation evidence: workshop records + interviews + survey of subsidiary risk owners + Board to Board engagement + Country Managing Director consultation + procurement leads engagement + relevant function consultation (HR + Legal + Procurement + Sustainability + Operations). Joint statement coordination (Section 14(2)) for parent entities filing on behalf of subsidiaries + each subsidiary acknowledgement evidence + consolidated risk view + group-level policy coverage + collective due diligence. Criterion 7 - Any other relevant information including: corporate strategy alignment + UN Sustainable

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Criterion 6 consultation evidence (workshops + interviews + surveys + Board-to-Board)
  • Joint statement coordination evidence (parent + subsidiary acknowledgement)
  • Criterion 7 SDG 8.7 + 5.2 + 16.2 alignment + UNGC + GRI 408/409/414 + SASB + ISSB + ASRS reporting integration
  • Principal governing body Board approval evidence (Section 14)
  • Statement signed by responsible member of principal governing body
  • McMillan Review 30 recommendation alignment evidence
Where this commonly fails
  • Consultation evidence formal only without substantive engagement
  • Joint statement signed by parent only without subsidiary acknowledgement
  • Other information (Criterion 7) omitted or generic
  • Statement not signed by responsible member of principal governing body

Mandatory Criterion 3 - Modern Slavery Risks - Australia MSA 2018

AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-3-Modern-Slavery-Risks-Operations-Supply-Chain-Section-16-1c-Sector-Geographic-Indicators
Australia MSA Mandatory Criterion 3 + Modern Slavery Risks + Section 16(1)(c) + Sector + Geographic Indicators

Address Mandatory Criterion 3 of Modern Slavery Statement under Section 16(1)(c) - describe risks of modern slavery practices in operations and supply chains of reporting entity + entities owned or controlled by reporting entity. Risk identification methodology including: country-level risk indicators (Global Slavery Index + Walk Free Foundation + ILO Forced Labour Index + USDOL List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor + TIP Report State Department Trafficking in Persons Report) + sector-level risk (high-risk sectors include textile + apparel + footwear + electronics + agriculture/horticulture + fishing + mining + construction + cleaning + hospitality + healthcare + transport + warehousing + ICT manufacturing) + product-level risk (cocoa + cotton + coffee + tea + sugar + tobacco + tin + tantalum + tungsten + gold + palm oil + seafood + bricks + carpets + electronics + appare

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Criterion 3 risk assessment with country + sector + product + workforce indicators
  • Global Slavery Index + Walk Free + ILO + USDOL List + TIP Report integration
  • High-risk sector identification (textile + electronics + agriculture + construction + cleaning + hospitality + ICT etc)
  • High-risk product identification (cocoa + cotton + coffee + sugar + 3TG + palm oil + seafood etc)
  • Migrant worker + recruitment fee debt + visa-tied workers risk assessment
  • Home Affairs Sector-Specific Guidance adoption evidence
Where this commonly fails
  • Risk assessment relies on country-level only (no sector or product nuance)
  • Workforce-level risks (migrant workers + recruitment fees) not assessed
  • USDOL List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor not consulted
  • Sector-Specific Guidance not adopted for high-risk sectors

Mandatory Criterion 4 - Actions Taken - Australia MSA 2018

AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-4-Actions-Section-16-1d-Due-Diligence-Supplier-Code-Worker-Voice-Recruitment-Fees
Australia MSA Mandatory Criterion 4 + Actions + Section 16(1)(d) + Due Diligence + Supplier Code + Worker Voice + Recruitment Fees

Address Mandatory Criterion 4 of Modern Slavery Statement under Section 16(1)(d) - describe actions taken by reporting entity to assess and address modern slavery risks including due diligence and remediation. Policy framework including: Modern Slavery Policy + Human Rights Policy + Supplier Code of Conduct + Worker Code of Conduct + Whistleblower Policy + Anti-Discrimination Policy + Recruitment Policy. Contractual clauses with suppliers including: prohibition of modern slavery + audit rights + right to terminate + flow-down to sub-suppliers + remediation cooperation + Employer Pays Principle + zero recruitment fees + transparent recruitment + retention of identity documents prohibition + freedom of movement + freedom of association + decent working conditions + safe and healthy work + grievance access. Worker Voice and Grievance Mechanism including: direct worker grievance channel + an

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Modern Slavery Policy + Human Rights Policy + Supplier Code of Conduct + Whistleblower Policy
  • Supplier contractual clauses (prohibition + audit + termination + flow-down + remediation)
  • Employer Pays Principle implementation + recruitment fees prohibited + transparent recruitment
  • Worker Voice + Grievance Mechanism (direct + anonymous + third-party hotline)
  • Due diligence operations (Sedex SMETA + amfori BSCI + SA8000 + RBA + RJC + ASI + RSPO + Fair Trade)
  • Corrective Action Plans (CAPs) tracking + remediation outcomes + workers receive remediation evidence
  • Training records (procurement + HR + leadership + workforce)
Where this commonly fails
  • Employer Pays Principle not enforced with suppliers
  • Worker Voice mechanism not anonymous or third-party operated
  • Audits limited to Tier 1 suppliers
  • Remediation outcomes not documented (workers receive remedy)
  • Sector certifications used as sole due diligence without complementary measures

Mandatory Criterion 5 - Effectiveness - Australia MSA 2018

AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-5-Effectiveness-Section-16-1e-Assurance-KPIs-Continuous-Improvement
Australia MSA Mandatory Criterion 5 + Effectiveness + Section 16(1)(e) + Independent Assurance + KPIs + Continuous Improvement

Address Mandatory Criterion 5 of Modern Slavery Statement under Section 16(1)(e) - describe how reporting entity assesses effectiveness of actions to assess and address modern slavery risks. Effectiveness measurement framework: outcome-based KPIs aligned with UN Guiding Principles tracking and remedy outcomes + input-based KPIs (training completion + policy coverage + supplier engagement rate) + process-based KPIs (audit completion + corrective action closure rate + grievance handling SLA) + output-based KPIs (suppliers assessed + workers reached + cases identified + cases remediated). Independent assurance options: third-party audit + ASAE 3000 ISAE 3000 limited assurance + reasonable assurance + Internal Audit second-line review + civil society engagement (Walk Free + Anti-Slavery Australia + Be Slavery Free) + Better Business Bureau + UN Global Compact peer review + Anti-Slavery Commi

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Criterion 5 outcome + input + process + output KPIs
  • Independent assurance (third-party audit + ASAE 3000 + ISAE 3000 + Internal Audit second-line)
  • Civil society engagement (Walk Free + Anti-Slavery Australia + Be Slavery Free)
  • Annual review with Board involvement + lessons learned
  • Sector benchmarking participation
  • Emerging risk monitoring (climate + war + COVID-19 + cost-of-living + AI)
Where this commonly fails
  • Effectiveness assessment limited to compliance metrics (no outcome KPIs)
  • Independent assurance limited or absent
  • Civil society engagement formal only without substantive feedback
  • Lessons learned not incorporated into next-year actions

Reporting Period and Submission - Australia MSA 2018

AU-MSA-Reporting-Period-Submission-Section-13B-Six-Months-Annual-Statement-Lodgement-Register-Section-18
Australia MSA Reporting Period + Section 13 + Six Months Post Period End + Annual + Register + Section 18

Manage Modern Slavery Statement reporting period alignment + submission deadlines + Register publication. Reporting period must align with entity financial year (typically 1 July to 30 June for ATO-registered Australian entities OR calendar year for foreign entities). Submission deadline 6 months after end of reporting period (Section 13B). First reporting period was for financial year ending after 1 July 2019 with submission originally due 31 March 2020 (extended to 30 June 2020 due to COVID-19). Subsequent annual reporting required. Modern Slavery Statements Register (Section 18) maintained by Minister at modernslaveryregister.gov.au + publicly searchable + free access + statements remain on register indefinitely. Entity must lodge each year unless deregistered or below threshold (with voluntary continued reporting encouraged). Joint statements permitted (Section 14(2)) for parent enti

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Reporting period aligned with financial year evidence
  • 6-month post-period-end submission tracking
  • Modern Slavery Statements Register lodgement confirmation
  • Statement remains on Register evidence
  • Late submission Minister explanation response (where applicable)
Where this commonly fails
  • Reporting period not aligned with financial year
  • 6-month deadline missed without Minister explanation
  • Register lodgement not confirmed
  • Statement signed by non-principal-governing-body member

Scope and Authority - Australia MSA 2018

AU-MSA-Scope-Act-153-2018-Assent-10-December-2018-Effective-1-January-2019-Section-13-AUD-100M-Home-Affairs
Australia MSA Scope + Act 153 of 2018 + Assent 10 December 2018 + Effective 1 January 2019 + Section 13 + AUD 100M + Home Affairs

Establish the legal foundation of Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) Act No. 153 of 2018 + Royal Assent 10 December 2018 + commenced 1 January 2019 + administered by Department of Home Affairs Modern Slavery Branch + Anti-Slavery Commissioner Office established 2024 with inaugural Anti-Slavery Commissioner Chris Evans. Reporting Entity Threshold under Section 13: entities with consolidated annual revenue of AUD 100 million or more during reporting period + Australian entity OR foreign entity carrying on business in Australia + Commonwealth Government entity (mandatory regardless of revenue) + voluntary reporting by entities below threshold. Approximately 3,000+ entities lodge Modern Slavery Statements annually. First reporting period due 31 March 2020 (extended to 30 June 2020 due to COVID-19) + subsequent annual reporting due 6 months after end of reporting period. Modern slavery

Artefacts an auditor will ask for
  • Section 13 threshold assessment (AUD 100M consolidated annual revenue)
  • Australian entity OR foreign entity carrying on business in Australia determination
  • Commonwealth Government entity mandatory determination
  • Voluntary reporting evidence if below threshold
  • Joint statement structure (Section 14(2)) where applicable
  • First reporting period determination + financial year alignment
Where this commonly fails
  • Threshold assessment based on revenue not consolidated annual revenue
  • Foreign entity scope determined without 'carrying on business in Australia' analysis
  • Joint statement structure unclear for global parent entities
Assembled from the framework's own control set. Every line traces to a control in the graph, so this pack is regenerated rather than written, and stays current as the graph does.

Assembled from the framework’s own control set, so this list is regenerated rather than written and stays current as the graph does. See the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) framework page.