NATO STANAG 4774 (Confidentiality Metadata Labels) and STANAG 4778 (Metadata Binding)
Evidence request list. 8 controls, 8 carrying auditor artefact guidance. Generated from the compliance knowledge graph on 12 September 2026. Published by The Art of Service.
Application Handling
Implement STANAG 4774/4778 label handling across email per RFC 8551 S/MIME + RFC 9580 OpenPGP profiles, documents per OOXML/ODF embedded metadata + PDF/X-3 embedded XML, file storage per NTFS/EXT4 extended attributes + cloud object storage tags. Configure email gateways (Microsoft Exchange + Postfix + Sendmail + Cisco IronPort + Proofpoint + Mimecast) to verify + filter + route based on STANAG labels. Configure document management systems (SharePoint + OpenText + IBM Filenet + Documentum) to enforce label-based access control + retention.
- Email gateway configuration
- Document management system integration
- Storage attribute mapping
- S/MIME profile compliance
- OOXML/PDF embedded label samples
- Cloud tag mapping
- Email gateway not configured
- Documents missing labels
- Storage attributes lost
- No cloud tag mapping
Caveats and Releasability
Apply STANAG 4774 caveats (NOFORN + REL TO + EYES ONLY + LIMDIS + ORCON + SI + TK + HCS + KLONDIKE + national caveats) and releasability markings (REL TO countries) per the originator security policy. Apply STANAG 4774 conditions (compartment + sub-compartment + handling instructions + dissemination controls + special handling). Validate caveat compatibility before any release decision. Enforce caveat-based access control through Attribute Based Access Control (ABAC) systems integrated with STANAG 4778 bound labels.
- Caveat code register
- Releasability matrix
- ABAC policy integration
- Release decision logs
- Caveat compatibility validation
- Special compartment handling procedures
- Missing caveat codes
- No releasability matrix
- No ABAC integration
- Unvalidated release decisions
Cross-Domain Solutions
Implement cross-domain label translation between NATO and national classification systems via Cross Domain Solution (CDS) capable of parsing + validating + translating STANAG 4774 labels across security domains. Conduct interoperability testing using NATO Interoperability Standards and Profiles (NISP) test cases + Coalition Warrior Interoperability eXploration Experimentation Examination Exercise (CWIX) + Bold Quest joint exercises. Coordinate with NATO Information Exchange Gateway Service (IEGS) for low-side to high-side data transfers per AC/322(SC/4)WP(2018) Cross Domain Solutions Policy.
- CDS deployment authorisation
- NISP test case results
- CWIX participation evidence
- Bold Quest participation
- Translation rule sets
- IEGS coordination records
- No CDS authorisation
- Missing NISP testing
- No CWIX participation
- Incomplete translation rules
Label Authoring
Provide approved label authoring tools that produce STANAG 4774 compliant labels including originator identification (distinguished name + originator identifier per ITU-T X.509), policy identifier referencing the applicable national or NATO security policy, and policy version. Approved tools: Boldon James Classifier + TITUS Classification + Janusseal + Cysec + Microsoft Information Protection (with NATO connector) + Open Source Information Labelling System (OSILS) + STANAG 4778 reference implementations. Train users in correct label application per AC/322(SC/4)WP(2019)0001 NATO Labelling Guidance.
- Approved tool inventory
- Tool deployment records
- Originator distinguished name register
- Security policy register
- Policy version tracking
- User training records
- Unapproved tools
- Missing originator DN
- Outdated policy reference
- No user training
Label Lifecycle
Verify confidentiality label authenticity and integrity on data ingress per STANAG 4778 binding verification. Reject or quarantine data with invalid + corrupted + unrecognised labels. Preserve labels throughout processing including data transformation + extract-transform-load (ETL) operations + analytics pipelines + content delivery. Apply label inheritance rules to derivative products (highest contributing label rule per NATO Security Policy). Maintain audit trails of label preservation through processing pipelines.
- Ingress verification logic deployment
- Quarantine procedures
- Label preservation in ETL pipelines
- Inheritance rule documentation
- Audit trails of label evolution
- Derivative product labelling
- No ingress verification
- Lost labels through processing
- Wrong inheritance rule
- No audit trail
Label Schema
Adopt the NATO STANAG 4774 (Confidentiality Metadata Label) XML schema as the canonical confidentiality labelling format for classified and protectively marked information. Implement the OriginatorConfidentialityLabel + AlternativeConfidentialityLabel + Classification + ClassificationCategories + Caveats + Releasability + Releasability+ Conditions XML elements per the published XML Schema Definition (XSD). Map national classification systems (US NOFORN/SECRET/TS + UK OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE/SECRET/TOP-SECRET + DE VS-NfD/GEHEIM + FR DR/CD/SD/TSD + EU RESTREINT-UE/CONFIDENTIEL-UE/SECRET-UE) into STANAG 4774 classification equivalents.
- STANAG 4774 XSD adoption record
- XML validation tooling deployment
- National classification mapping matrix
- Sample compliant labels
- Schema version tracking
- No XSD validation
- Missing classification mapping
- Outdated schema version
- No sample compliance
Metadata Binding
Apply STANAG 4778 metadata binding to associate STANAG 4774 confidentiality labels with the data they describe via cryptographic binding using XML Digital Signatures (XML-DSig) per W3C XMLDSIG-CORE specification. Use the STANAG 4778 BoundConfidentialityLabel + MetadataBindingContainer + DataObjectReference elements. Implement supported binding profiles: Enveloped + Enveloping + Detached + Email (RFC 8551 S/MIME). Use cryptographic algorithms per CNSA Suite 1.0 / 2.0 (RSA-3072 + ECDSA P-384 + SHA-384 + AES-256-GCM) or national equivalents.
- STANAG 4778 binding implementation
- XML-DSig validation
- Binding profile inventory
- CNSA Suite algorithm compliance
- Sample bound containers
- Key management procedures
- No binding mechanism
- Outdated algorithms
- Missing profile coverage
- No key management
Operations and Training
Establish incident response procedures for label failures including incorrect labelling + over-classification + under-classification + label loss in transit + label corruption. Conduct annual user training covering STANAG 4774 label structure + 4778 binding + correct application + caveats + releasability + common errors. Audit label application accuracy + completeness + currency on at least an annual basis with statistical sampling. Report aggregate metrics to the Information Assurance Officer + NATO Information Assurance Authority (INFOSEC).
- Label failure IR procedures
- Annual training programme
- Training completion records
- Annual audit reports
- Statistical sampling methodology
- INFOSEC reporting
- No IR for label failures
- No annual training
- Missing audit reports
- No INFOSEC reporting
Assembled from the framework’s own control set, so this list is regenerated rather than written and stays current as the graph does. See the NATO STANAG 4774 (Confidentiality Metadata Labels) and STANAG 4778 (Metadata Binding) framework page.