Risk Appetite Statement
What is Risk Appetite Statement?
A formal document expressing the board-approved levels and types of risk an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives.
Terms that appear alongside risk appetite statement
Each of these is named in at least one of the same controls as risk appetite statement. The number is how many controls name both.
- risk appetite 22 shared controls
- compliance 10 shared controls
- governance 10 shared controls
- audit 9 shared controls
- risk management framework 7 shared controls
- material risk 6 shared controls
- risk governance 6 shared controls
- governance framework 6 shared controls
Frameworks that govern risk appetite statement
What the standards actually require on risk appetite statement
Requirements naming risk appetite statement across 6 standards, quoted from the control text.
The institution must maintain an appropriate, clear and concise risk appetite statement addressing its material risks, with the Board responsible for setting risk appetite and required to approve the statement.
CPS220-06 · Risk Appetite Statement →Maintain Risk Appetite Statement + Risk Limits + Concentration Risk Management + Limit Breach Protocols per 12 CFR Part 30 Appendix D Sections II.E + II.F + II.G + II.H + II.I + II.K.
OCCHS-3 · Risk Appetite Statement, Risk Limits, Concentration Risk, and Limit Breach Protocols →The RSE licensee must maintain an up to date risk appetite statement covering its business operations and each category of material risk, approved by the Board.
SPS220-19 · Risk Appetite Statement →The IRM Risk Architecture + Strategy + Protocols (RASP) framework defines the governance + structural + behavioural enabling elements of effective enterprise risk management.
IRM-Architecture-Strategy-Protocols-Appetite-Culture-Board-Audit-Committee-CRO-Three-Lines · IRM RASP - Risk Architecture + Strategy + Protocols + Risk Appetite Statement + Risk Culture + Board + Audit Committee + Chief Risk Officer + Three Lines of Defence + Tone at the Top →The Jamaica Data Protection Act 2020 establishes a comprehensive penalty regime spanning criminal + civil + and administrative penalties. (1) Section 50 Administrative Penalties: (a) imposed by Commissioner; (b) UP TO JMD 10 MILLION per violation;
JM-DPA2020-Penalty-Risk-Sec31-33-50-52-Criminal-Civil-Administrative-Up-to-10M-JMD-Compensation-Imprisonment · Jamaica DPA 2020 Penalty Risk Management + Sections 31-33 + 50 + 52 + Criminal Offences + Civil Compensation + Administrative Penalties + Up to JMD 10 Million + Imprisonment + Director/Officer Liability + Reasonable Care Defence →The FSA expects financial institutions to implement a comprehensive cybersecurity risk management framework + aligned with NIST CSF 2.0 + FFIEC IT Examination Handbook + ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS + integrated into Enterprise Risk Management (ERM).
JP-FSA-CYB-Risk-Management-NIST-CSF-FFIEC-Aligned-Identify-Protect-Detect-Respond-Recover-Govern-Plan-Do-Check-Act · Japan FSA Cybersecurity Risk Management Framework + NIST CSF 2.0 Aligned + FFIEC Crosswalk + Identify Protect Detect Respond Recover Govern + ISO 27001 ISMS + Plan-Do-Check-Act + Inherent vs Residual Risk + Risk Appetite + Cyber Risk in ERM →Questions people ask about risk appetite statement
What is Risk Appetite Statement?
Why is Risk Appetite Statement important for compliance?
Which compliance frameworks address Risk Appetite Statement?
Where can I learn more about Risk Appetite Statement?
See how Risk Appetite Statement applies across compliance frameworks
Our platform maps 686 frameworks with 311K cross-framework control mappings. Explore how this concept is addressed across standards.