ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs APRA CPS 234
What is the difference between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and APRA CPS 234?
ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices is a government framework applying in Australia, with 29 controls across 8 domains. APRA CPS 234 is a government framework applying in Australia, with 24 controls across 10 domains. Both govern the same subject, so their requirements overlap; the mapping below shows which controls carry across and which are asked for by only one of them.
ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices29 controls
APRA CPS 23424 controls
Questions people ask about ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and APRA CPS 234
What is the difference between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and APRA CPS 234?
ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices has 29 controls while APRA CPS 234 has 24 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and APRA CPS 234?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and APRA CPS 234 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and APRA CPS 234 controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and APRA CPS 234 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices or APRA CPS 234?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 58 shared controlsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents7 shared controlsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs ACSC Essential Eight1 shared controlAPRA CPS 234 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 524 shared controlsAPRA CPS 234 vs C5 (Germany)24 shared controlsAPRA CPS 234 vs SOC 224 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and APRA CPS 234 on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.