ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
What is the difference between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices is a government framework applying in Australia, with 29 controls across 8 domains. ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents is a other framework applying in Australia, with 37 controls across 5 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices29 controls
ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents37 controls
Questions people ask about ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
What is the difference between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices has 29 controls while ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices or ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 58 shared controlsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs APRA CPS 2343 shared controlsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs ACSC Essential Eight1 shared controlASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 535 shared controlsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CIS Controls v834 shared controlsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs FedRAMP Moderate33 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.