HKMA SPM vs MITRE D3FEND

What is the difference between HKMA SPM and MITRE D3FEND?

HKMA SPM is a risk management framework applying in Hong Kong, with 11 controls across 7 domains. MITRE D3FEND is a other framework applying in International, with 8 controls across 8 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.

HKMA SPM11 controls

MITRE D3FEND8 controls

Questions people ask about HKMA SPM and MITRE D3FEND

What is the difference between HKMA SPM and MITRE D3FEND?

HKMA SPM has 11 controls while MITRE D3FEND has 8 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.

Do I need both HKMA SPM and MITRE D3FEND?

Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between HKMA SPM and MITRE D3FEND so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.

How do HKMA SPM and MITRE D3FEND controls map to each other?

Our platform maps controls between HKMA SPM and MITRE D3FEND at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.

Which framework should I implement first, HKMA SPM or MITRE D3FEND?

The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.