IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) vs IEEE 1686
What is the difference between IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) and IEEE 1686?
IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) is a risk management framework applying in International (IAIS), with 205 controls across 24 domains. IEEE 1686 is a other framework applying in International, with 14 controls across 5 domains. They govern different subjects, so the overlap is limited to the governance requirements they share. The mapping below shows where that is.
IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)205 controls
IEEE 168614 controls
Questions people ask about IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) and IEEE 1686
What is the difference between IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) and IEEE 1686?
IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) has 205 controls while IEEE 1686 has 14 controls. Both frameworks address compliance requirements but differ in scope, focus, and applicability. Use our platform to explore the exact control-to-control mappings.
Do I need both IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) and IEEE 1686?
Whether you need both depends on your industry, regulatory requirements, and customer expectations. Many organizations implement multiple frameworks simultaneously. Our compliance platform helps you map controls between IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) and IEEE 1686 so you can identify shared requirements and avoid duplicate effort.
How do IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) and IEEE 1686 controls map to each other?
Our platform maps controls between IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) and IEEE 1686 at a granular level. Each mapping shows whether controls are fully aligned, partially aligned, or represent gaps. This helps you prioritize implementation when pursuing both frameworks.
Which framework should I implement first, IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) or IEEE 1686?
The best starting point depends on your specific regulatory requirements, industry, and customer demands. Consider which framework is most urgently required by your stakeholders or regulators. Use our free compliance platform to run a gap analysis and determine the optimal implementation sequence.
Each framework on its own
Comparisons people read next
Each of these compares one of the two standards above against another it shares controls with.
IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) vs MTCS (Singapore)5 shared controlsIAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) vs South Korea ISMS-P5 shared controlsIAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security4 shared controlsIEEE 1686 vs IEC 624436 shared controlsIEEE 1686 vs API 11646 shared controlsIEEE 1686 vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)5 shared controls
See all control mappings with interactive gap analysis
Explore the complete mapping between IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) and IEEE 1686 on our compliance platform.
Written and maintained by Gerard Blokdyk, The Art of Service.